CD Skripsi
Perbandingan Perencanaan Balok Dan Kolom Struktur Portal Baja Gedung Bertingkat Tidak Beraturan Mengunakan Sni 1729 2020 Dan 1729 2015
ABSTRACT
The design of the steel structure must be designed in such a way according to SNI 1729 2020 so that it can withstand the load or force acting on the structure. The update of SNI 1729 2020 to SNI 1729 2015 resulted in differences in the design of beams and columns for steel structures. This study aims to analyze the design comparison of beams and columns of steel structures and identify irregularities in the structure. The structure of this building is analyzed against the 2017 earthquake map. In the analysis carried out, the structure can meet the requirements for the deviation between levels, the performance of the structure and the forces in the structure based on the Direct Analysis Method (DAM). Structural beams and columns must be able to withstand internal forces that work based on the Direct Analysis Method (DAM) based on SNI 1729 2020. From the design carried out, there are differences in the design of the compression member which has a slender profile. In planning the compression member with a slender profile, there are differences in the formulas in SNI 172920 and SNI 1729 2015. From the analysis, the nominal compressive strength value of one of the IWF columns is 708.302.15.28 with a slender profile based on SNI 1729 2020 as follows the nominal compressive strength of flexure Pn = 9,410 kn and nominal compressive strength of torque is 9,854 Kn while in SNI 1729 2015 nominal compressive strength of bending Pn = 10,084 Kn nominal strength of torque Pn = 10,287 Kn. From this research, it can be concluded that the nominal strength of compression rods with slender profiles designed based on SNI 1729 2020 is smaller than SNI 1729 2015.
Keywords: SNI 1729 2020, SNI 1729 2015, compression rod, nominal compressive strength (Pn), Direct Analysis Method (DAM).
Tidak tersedia versi lain