CD Skripsi

Tinjauan Yuridis Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Monitoring Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia

---

The lack of functioning institutions of government oversight that exist, both at the central and regional governments organizers and because of the lack of supervision or control functions that are not running as it should is the factor that makes criminals are free of corruption. So the Commission with monitoring authority so the organizers are expected to oversee all state governments, although the Commission still has some weaknesses in state government to monitor all providers.
The purpose of this thesis, namely: first, to determine Monitoring Authority Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in Combating Corruption in Indonesia; second, to determine weakness faced by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) on Monitoring of Corruption in Indonesia. In writing this essay writing using normative juridical research method that focuses on the legal synchronization starts from existing laws, by conducting the identification in advance of the legal rules that have been formulated in specific legislation, then analyzed qualitatively and make conclusion of the deductive method.
Results of the study authors, is that: first, monitoring the activities carried out to check the appearance of the activity that is being done. Monitoring authority stipulated in Article 6 paragraph (e) and Article 14 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30 of 2002 on the Corruption Eradication Commission, KPK monitoring the state government administrators, conduct an assessment of the administrative management system in all state institutions and government, advising heads of state institutions and the government to make changes if it is based on the results of the assessment, administrative management system has the potential to corruption, reported to the President of the Republic of Indonesia, the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia, and the audit board, if the advice of the Corruption Eradication Commission proposal is not heeded. Secondly, the Commission still has some weaknesses in the monitoring of corruption eradication in Indonesia, namely as weak monitoring arrangement on this plus other weaknesses such as the lack Commission budget and offices, as well as the lack of employees (SDM). Suggestions author: first, the Commission with monitoring authority should be able to closely supervise state officials, and can be dropped directly into the area to monitor directly the organizers of the governments that are in the area, and monitoring advice or recommendations given by the Commission is completely revamped or repaired. Second, if the setting of monitoring is not yet clear, it is necessary membut government regulation (PP) or make improvements or amendments to legislation and adding provisions that strengthen the monitoring authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission.
Keywords: Authority - Monitoring - KPK - Corruption.

---

Ketersediaan

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

-

No. Panggil

09 08. 115 (0006)

Penerbit

Pekanbaru : Universitas Riau - Fakultas Hukum - Hukum Acara Pidana., 2015

Deskripsi Fisik

vi, 93 hlm.: ill.; 29 cm

Bahasa

Indonesia

ISBN/ISSN

-

Klasifikasi

09 08. 115 (0006)

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

-

Subjek

HUKUM ACARA PIDANA

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

DAUS

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar