CD Tesis
Pengembangan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots) Pada Materi Matematika Wajib Kelas X Semester Ganjil
The development of HOTS questions in this study resulted much of HOTS question bank obtaines used in daily test and last exams. The HOTS problem developed includes three aspects,the analyse aspect (C-4), the evaluation aspect (C-5) and the creative aspect (C-6). The resulting HOTS questions divided into 10 analysis questions, 11 evaluation questions and 9 creative questions. To produce this HOTS question, the researcher used a formative research model introduced by Tessmer. This model consists of 4 stages, namely analyzing (analyse), design, development, formatively evaluate, summativelly evaluate. In the development stages that have been carried out so the result of HOTS questions are validated by 3 validators who are experts in their fields. The validation process of HOTS questions is carried out in three aspects, namely material aspects, construction aspects and language aspects, which act as validators here are experts who understand mathematics learning.
Based on the analysis of reliability, distinguishing a power, the lever of difficulty and quality of distracing options in small group. It was found that the number of valid HOTS questions was 30 questions consisting of 10 analysis questions with indicators below (1) the questions involving students determining ways to organize pieces of information (2) the question involving the process of sorting out the relevant parts or the importance of a structure (3) the questions develop students ability to connect ideas (4) the questions allow a students to determine the purpose behind the information (5) the questions develop students decision-making skills (6) the questions involve students in the procces of breaking the material into part small section, 11 evaluation questions with indicators (1) the questions involve of decision-making process based on criteria (2) the questions involve students to make decisions wether the method or method used is the best or not (3) the questions involve student to make decision on the suitability of a procedure or information (method or method) for solving problem (4) the questions involve the uses of performance standarts with clear criteria (5) the problems involves students to synthesize something into a whole (6) questins are not just writing or building something like the elements taught in the application category (8) the questions are not justing sorting out relevant information or not like the elements taught in the analyzing category.
A validation by the validator (content validation) in this study wa a good category, the validation of HOTS questions, the analysis category for the material aspect was 3,2 and the construction and language aspect were 3,1 respectively. The validation of HOTS questins in the evaluation category for material aspect, construction aspects and language werw 3,2 respectively. The validation of HOTS questions in the creation category with a validation index of 0,4 at a significant rate of 5 % with df = 18, which means that 30 HOTS questions are construct valid. The reliability analysis of HOTS questions is in the very high category of 0,96 which means that it will produce the same score if is it used repeatedly. The analyse of the distinguishing power of HOTS questions is in the criteria of more tjan 0,2, this means that the level of distinguishing power is categorized as good. The difficulty level HOTS questions for the medium category was 29 items and 1 item in the difficult category. The effectiveness of the tricksters has gone well according to the function of the trick.
Keyword: Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) Instrument, Validity, Reliability and effectiveness of distractor.
Tidak tersedia versi lain