CD Skripsi

Analisis Hukum Terhadap Fungsi Supervisi Oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia

---

ABSTRACT
Substantially, there is a common operational responsibility in terms of
carrying out legal actions of investigation and prosecution of corruption
perpetrators between the Corruption Eradication Commission and Police
investigators. Weak Coordination and Supervision between lines of law
enforcement, as well as problems in the implementation of duties and authority,
making it possible to have blemishes and lack of accountability or lack of
accountability as well as clarity in carrying out duties and authorities in
eradicating criminal acts of corruption. This study aims to determine the function
of Supervision by the Corruption Eradication Commission in law enforcement in
Indonesia and to find out the ideal arrangement of the Supervision function in
resolving cases of Corruption in Indonesia.
This type of research used in this study is normative legal research. In
this normative legal research, the writer conducts a research on law
synchronization which starts from the existing law, by conducting an
identification in advance of the legal principles that have been formulated in the
legislation. The method used by the author in this research is through document
study literature study, the type of research data are primary, secondary and tesier
legal materials. Data Collection Techniques use normative legal research
techniques (legal research) methods used are literature study or documentary
studies. Literature study is a data collection technique by conducting a study of
books, literature, notes and cases that occur based on the above problems.
The task of supervision of the Corruption Eradication Commission has
the authority to conduct supervision, research, or study of agencies that carry out
their duties and authority relating to the Eradication of Corruption. Supervision is
grouped into two types, namely general supervision and special supervision.
General supervision of the Police and Attorney General is carried out
simultaneously with the time of implementation of coordination. Whereas special
supervision of cases handled by the prosecutor and the police is carried out at the
request of the police or the prosecutor's office or at the initiative of the KPK
based on the KPK leadership's consideration. The ideal concept of the Corruption
Eradication Commission's supervisory function in completing cases is carried out
in a number of ways, including institutional arrangements at the Corruption
Eradication Commission, the Police and Attorney General's Office also being
crucial. Because one of the obstacles is not functioning optimally the coordination
and supervision function is because the Corruption Eradication Commission, the
Police and the Prosecutor's Office still lacks clear institutions for the
implementation of these functions.
Keywords: Criminal Action, Corruption, Supervision Function, Corruption
Eradication Commission

---

Ketersediaan

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

-

No. Panggil

09 04. 120 (0243)

Penerbit

Pekanbaru : Universitas Riau – Fakultas Hukum – Hukum Pidana., 2020

Deskripsi Fisik

xii, 29 hlm.; ill.: 29 cm

Bahasa

Indonesia

ISBN/ISSN

-

Klasifikasi

09 04. 120 (0243)

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

-

Subjek

HUKUM PIDANA

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

Daus

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar