CD Skripsi

Perbandingan Hukum Pemberhentian Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Di Indonesia, Amerika, Dan Italia

---

The aim of this research is to analyze the comparison of the impeachment systems for presidents and vice presidents in Indonesia, the United States, and Italy. The background of this study is the differences in government systems and the impeachment mechanisms for presidents in these three countries, despite their similarities in the legal systems they adhere to. This research comprehensively examines the legal basis, mechanisms, reasons, as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the impeachment systems for presidents and vice presidents in each country.
This study is a normative legal research with a comparative law approach. The data used are secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Data collection techniques are carried out through literature study, and data analysis uses qualitative methods.
The results of the research show that the legal basis for the impeachment of presidents and vice presidents in Indonesia is regulated in the 1945 Constitution, in the United States in the U.S. Constitution, and in Italy in the Italian Constitution. The impeachment mechanism in Indonesia involves the House of Representatives (DPR), the Constitutional Court (MK), and the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR), in the United States it involves the House of Representatives and the Senate, while in Italy it involves the Parliament and the Constitutional Court. The reasons for impeachment in the three countries generally relate to legal violations, treason, and constitutional violations. The weaknesses of the impeachment system in Indonesia include the lack of clear guidelines regarding the reasons for impeachment and strong political dominance, while its strengths lie in the presidential system that ensures the separation of powers and a relatively simple process. The United States has a strong system of checks and balances as a strength, but subjective interpretation of the reasons for impeachment can be a weakness. Meanwhile, the strength of the Italian system lies in the clarity of the reasons for impeachment, while its weakness is the potential for protracted interpretation and the influence of political dynamics. In conclusion, each country has its strengths and weaknesses in its presidential impeachment system, reflecting different governmental systems and political dynamics. The recommendation is that legal reforms in Indonesia are needed to provide clearer guidelines regarding the reasons and mechanisms for presidential impeachment and to strengthen the role of the judiciary in the process.

Keywords: Impeachment, Comparative Law, Government System, Indonesia, Italy.

---

Ketersediaan

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

-

No. Panggil

2009110007

Penerbit

Pekanbaru : Universitas Riau - F. Hukum - Hukum Tata Negara., 2024

Deskripsi Fisik

-

Bahasa

Indonesia

ISBN/ISSN

-

Klasifikasi

2009110007

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

-

Subjek

HUKUM TATA NEGARA

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

Vina

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar