CD Skripsi
Pelaksanaan Kewenangan Jaksa Pengacara Negara Di Bidang Tata Usaha Negara Pada Kejaksaan Tinggi Riau
ABSTRACT
The Attorney General’s Office of the Republic of Indonesia as regulated in
Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of
Indonesia is a government institution that carries out state duties in the field of
prosecution and other authorities based on law. Where one of his duties is in the
field of Civil and State Administration where the prosecutor with special powers
can act both inside and outside the court for and on behalf of the state or
government which is referred to as the State Attorney. In practice, the task as
state attorney in handling State Administrative dispute cases can also be carried
out by lawyers who are advocates. During the last three years, there have only
been two cases of State Administrative disputes handled by the State Attorney of
the Riau High Court. So that the writing of this thesis aims to determine the
criteria for State Administrative cases that can be handled by the State Attorney in
the field of State Administration at the Riau High Court and to find out how the
implementation of the authority of the State Attorney in the State Administration
at the Riau High Court.
This type of research can be classified in the type of sociological research
which is carried out by direct research on the place under study to provide a
complete and clear picture of the problem being studied. This research was
conducted in the High Service Office of Riau, while the population and the sample
are the parties related to the problem studied in this study. The data sources used
are; primary data, secondary data, and tertiary data, the data collection
techniques in this study were methods and interviews and literature study.
From the results of this study, two conclusions can be drawn. First, cases
or State Administrative disputes that can be handled by the Riau High Court.
Second, this study discusses the implementation of the authority of the State
Attorney at the Riau High Court. The researcher’s suggestions are, firstly, there is
a correction of the prosecutor’s duties and authorities in the field of state
administration. Second, the provisions on the separation of authority are clearer
for State Attorneys in both the Civil and State Administration scope. Third, strict
provisions to be addressed to government agencies, state institutions,
BUMN/BUMD to cooperate using the services of a State Attorney when there is a
state administrative dispute.
Keywords: Public Prosecutor – State Lawyer – Authority
Tidak tersedia versi lain