CD Tesis

Perbedaaan Kewenangan Pengawasan Suap Dan Gratifikasi Antara KPK Dan Institusi Penegak Hukum Lainnya

---

This study aims to analyze the Reporting Settings of Bribery and Gratification in the Perspectives of Corruption Law and to
To know and understand the Disparities conducted by the KPK in applying the provisions regulating the Bribery and Gratification in the Eradication of Corruption. This study uses normative legal research methods where the data collected are analyzed by sentences associated with existing theories.
The results of the research show that bribery and Gratification Reporting Arrangements in Persepective of Corruption Act of Law that every State organizer receiving Gratification is not reported to KPK within 30 (thirty) working days since the date of gratuity received. Gratification reporting is considered to have been done by gratuity recipients if they meet the following requirements: Gratuity report submitted to KPK or other channels appointed by KPK, such as Gratification Control Unit at other Ministries / Institutions / Organizations / Local Governments that have implemented Gratification Control System; The gratuity report must contain complete information as outlined in the Gratification Report Form specified by the KPK; and has been declared complete and accepted by KPK. The reporting purpose provided by the law aims to break the potential for bribery for state officials.
The KPK's authority requires that every state organizer receiving gratuities deemed as bribes has the obligation to report to the KPK in order to free the ASN from abuse of office which has been prone to bribery and gratification with the following criteria: Civil Servant / State Apparatus (ASN) or state organizer receiving the prize or promise, where it is known or reasonably suspected that such gift or promise is given to move to do or not to do something in his / her position, which is contrary to his / her obligations and Civil Service / State Apparatus (ASN) or state organizers with the intent to benefit themselves or others unlawfully, or by abusing his power to force someone to give something, pay, or receive a payment with a piece, or to do something for himself.



Keywords: Differences of Authority, Supervision of Bribery and Gratification, KPK and Law Enforcement Institution

---

Ketersediaan

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

-

No. Panggil

10 14. 218 (0009)

Penerbit

Pekanbaru : Universitas Riau – Pascasarjana – Tesis Ilmu Hukum., 2018

Deskripsi Fisik

x, 147 hlm.; ill.; 29 cm

Bahasa

Indonesia

ISBN/ISSN

-

Klasifikasi

10 14. 218 (0009)

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

-

Subjek

PASCASARJANA (MAGISTER) ILMU HUKUM

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

FATAH

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar