CD Tesis
Konstruksi Berpikir Hakim Dalam Menerapkan Asas Lex Specialis Systematisch Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi
This study aims to analyze the construction of thought judges in applying the principle of lex specialis systematisch to law enforcement of criminal acts of corruption. In this study focus on two main problems, namely, how does the construction think the judge in applying the principle of lex specialis systematisch to the enforcement of the law of corruption? Second, why is there a difference in the judge's decision to apply the principle of lex specialis systematisch to the law enforcement of criminal acts of corruption? This type of research is normative. analyze written law. Data sources from the literature study included official documents, books, research results and so on. Data is analyzed qualitatively, drawing conclusions with deductive thinking methods.
The results of the research formulation of the first problem, in the four decisions examined there were no single decisions that applied the principle of lex specialis systematisch. Where the principle of lex specialis systematisch should be applied to the four decisions examined in this study. The results of the research on the second problem, the cause of differences in judges' decisions in applying the principle of lex specialis systematisch is because of the varied understanding of State financial losses by law enforcers that have an impact on their attitudes and opinions. The understanding that every state financial loss is an act of corruption will result in no consideration of evaluating whether there are other provisions that are more specifically regulating it, and because of disparities caused by freedom and independence of judicial power, and dissenting opinions.
Keywords : Principle of Lex Specialis Systematisch, Law Enforcement, Corruption Crime.
Tidak tersedia versi lain