CD Tesis
Analisis Yuridis Kewenangan Hakim Praperadilan Terhadap Putusan Penetapan Tersangka Dugaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Bank Century Berdasarkan Undangundang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
The pretrial authority is regulated in Article 1 number 10 and Article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) coupled with the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 regulates the object of pretrial which is related to legal / illegal arrest, detention, termination of investigation / prosecution, compensation, rehabilitation and determination of suspects, searches and seizures.
In one case, a pretrial judge committed a legal discovery of an alleged corruption case and decided to order the investigator of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) to carry out further legal proceedings and establish a suspect against Boediono, Muliaman D Hadad, Raden Pardede, et al. that it's not in the authority of pretrial. However, Article 10 of the Law on Judicial Power authorizes the Court not to refuse to examine, hear, and decide on a case filed under the pretext that the law does not exist or is unclear, but is obliged to examine and prosecute it. By using literature studies through a normative juridical approach with the nature of descriptive research the purpose of this study is to find out the ideal authority and concept of pretrial judges in deciding to order KPK investigators to determine suspects in cases of suspected Century Bank corruption.
Keywords: Authority, pretrial, assigning suspects.
Tidak tersedia versi lain