CD Skripsi

Analisis Hukum Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 Tentang Penyesuaian Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan Dan Jumlah Denda Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana

---

Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2012 is a regulation issued by the judiciary, which only bind to one of the sub integrated criminal justice system, which is confined to the courts. Thus, the partial policy will not be easy to realize the integration with integrated sub-system of criminal justice, such as the law enforcement agencies are authorized to conduct the investigation (police), and law enforcement agencies are authorized to conduct the prosecution/public prosecutor.
The purpose of writing this thesis, namely: First, to know the concept of minor criminal offenses before and after the Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2012. Secondly, to determine the legal issues after the enactment of the Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2012.
From the research, it can be concluded two main things. First, the concept of minor criminal offenses before and after the Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2012 has differences and similarities within the scope of substantive criminal law and criminal law formal. Equations within the scope of substantive criminal law is related to the threat of imprisonment to perpetrators and absence of protection to victims of crime a misdemeanor. While the equations within the scope of formal criminal law is procedural law is the law used by the event quick check shows. Differences in the scope of the substantive criminal law is not entirely change the provisions regarding misdemeanor. While the differences in the scope of the formal criminal law is subject to arrest offenders if the value of the goods or money is the object of the case more than Rp. 250, -. After the enactment of the Supreme Court, offenders subject to arrest if the value of the goods or money is the object of the case more than Rp. 2.500.000, -. Second, the legal issues after the enactment of the Supreme Court is still a violation of human rights because of the persistence of the detention of minor criminals, without exception to the prosecutor's indictment then the case will still be processed, checked by regular inspection and the case is not considered as a follow-criminal misdemeanor, and lack of socialization to the public prosecutor so as not to indict the Supreme Court according to Regulation (wrong in making the accusation).
Keywords: Supreme Court Rules-Theft Light

---

Ketersediaan

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

-

No. Panggil

09 04. 114 (0056)

Penerbit

Pekanbaru : Universitas Riau - Fakultas Hukum - Hukum Pidana., 2014

Deskripsi Fisik

viii, 82 hlm.: ill.; 29 cm

Bahasa

ISBN/ISSN

-

Klasifikasi

09 04. 114 (0056)

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

-

Subjek

HUKUM PIDANA

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

DAUS

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar