CD Skripsi
Pengembangan Modul Berbasis Sosio-Scientific Issues Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia Sebagai Upaya Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Dan Kemandirian Belajar Peserta Didik
The ability to think critically is the capacity to analyze and evaluate information in determining its reliability, thus enabling one to draw valid conclusions. Low levels of critical thinking ability are often attributed to students' tendency to memorize facts and formulas rather than understanding concepts. Concepts in chemical equilibrium must be thoroughly understood by students as they will continue to be implemented in subsequent chemistry concepts and daily life. The development of teaching modules is essential to facilitate the achievement of expected learning goals. One advantage of module development is its ability to be designed according to the learners' needs and school characteristics. Modules developed integrating socio-scientific issues can stimulate critical thinking skills enhance students' autonomy and.
This study aims to produce valid and reliable modules based on socio-scientific issues in the topic of chemical equilibrium and to determine the improvement in students' autonomy and critical thinking skills in this subject.
The research employed the Research and Development (R&D) method, utilizing the ADDIE model consisting of five phases: analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. Data collection techniques included interviews, student questionnaires, validation sheets, and user response questionnaires. Validation was assessed by three subject matter experts. Small-scale testing was conducted using two methods: individual testing and user response. Individual testing involved three students with high, medium, and low abilities. User response assessment involved 1 teachers and 20 students from SMAN 8 Mandau, SMAN 5 Pinggir, and SMAN 1 Pinggir. The research design for large-scale testing was a pre-experimental pretest-posttest control group design. Purposive sampling was used to select one sample class, consisting of 34 students from class XI A.1 SMAN 8 Mandau.
The research findings indicate that the developed module obtained an average expert validation percentage of 92%, indicating it is highly valid. Individual testing yielded feedback from students regarding module components that needed improvement, while user responses from both teachers and students scored 100% and 90%, respectively, indicating excellent quality. Large-scale testing data revealed pre- and post-module autonomy and pretest-posttest critical thinking ability of students. Paired t-test results for autonomy and critical thinking ability data showed a significance value of 0.000 (sig
Tidak tersedia versi lain