Digilib Perpustakaan Universitas Riau

Tugas Akhir, Skripsi, Tesis dan Disertasi Mahasiswa Universitas Riau

  • Beranda
  • Informasi
  • Berita
  • Bantuan
  • Pustakawan
  • Pilih Bahasa :
    Bahasa Arab Bahasa Bengal Bahasa Brazil Portugis Bahasa Inggris Bahasa Spanyol Bahasa Jerman Bahasa Indonesia Bahasa Jepang Bahasa Melayu Bahasa Persia Bahasa Rusia Bahasa Thailand Bahasa Turki Bahasa Urdu

Pencarian berdasarkan :

SEMUA Pengarang Subjek ISBN/ISSN Pencarian Spesifik

Pencarian terakhir:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
Image of Analisis Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pembuat Stempel Yang Dipergunakan Konsumen Untuk Tindak Pidana Dikaitkan Dengan Ajaran Kausalitas
Penanda Bagikan

CD Skripsi

Analisis Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pembuat Stempel Yang Dipergunakan Konsumen Untuk Tindak Pidana Dikaitkan Dengan Ajaran Kausalitas

PUTRI FAUZIAH / 150911342 - Nama Orang;

ABSTRACT
In the Penal Code (Penal Code) article 263 governs the crime of mail
forgery. There are several actions that belong to the type of mail forgery, one of
which is the creation of stamps that can cause the stamp maker to also be held
accountable. But in reality, the stamp was only used as a means of evidence in the
trial. This is known from the example of the Case Verdict Number:
1293/Pid.B/2018/PN. Pekanbaru with defendant Agus Salim Ahim,
Number:325/Pid.B/2013/PN. Pekanbaru with defendant Masrizal, and Number:
423/Pid.B/2017/PN. Pekanbaru with defendant Madi Permana Sesa states that
the stamp is only used as a tool of evidence seized for destruction. Criminal
liability is often also associated with the doctrine of causality. Causality is used as
a "filter" in establishing a person's criminal accountability. As a filter, causality
will filter out any factual actions committed by the perpetrator, after the factual
action is netted the next will be sought legal action. By finding his legal action, a
person will be held accountable.
The crime of stamp forgery is already very detrimental to society. Many
stamps from various government agencies are often forged by the public and even
State officials. Not all actions proven by the elements can lead to the perpetrator
being punished if he or she cannot be blamed so criminal responsibility cannot be
held. In practice many cases involving people in good faith are also held
responsible for such crimes. One of them is a stamp maker. But as the basis of the
judge's consideration in making a verdict is generally the same. The purpose of
writing this thesis is; first, To know the accountability of stamp makers that
consumers use for criminal acts is associated with the doctrine of causality.
Secondly to know the consequences of the breadth of criminal liability is
associated with the doctrine of causality. This type of research is normative
research, using an analytical approach. This method of thesis writing research
uses normative juridical methods.
From the results of research and discussion there are two main things that
can be concluded. First, the Criminal Penal Order is not used in detail when a
cause can be cited as a punishable consequence. Therefore, there are various
theories about causality: Conditio Sine Qua Non theory, the theory that
individualizes, and the generalizing theory. The generalized theory is divided into
2 namely: subjective adequat theory and objective adequat theory. Stamp makers
cannot be held liable if reviewed under the Penal Code, as in the example case
inverdictnumber:1293/Pid.B/2018/PN.Pbr,Number:325/Pid.B/2013/PN.Pbr,andN
umber:423/Pid.B/2017/PN.Pbr states that the stamp is only used as a tool of
evidence seized for destruction. But if it is associated with the doctrine of
causality then the stamp maker can be held accountable. Second, the
consequences of the law generated from the breadth of accountability cause
people who are in good faith to also be held accountable in a criminal offence. As
in the case of stamp forgery if associated with causality based on subjective
ix
adequat theory then stamp makers can be convicted in the case of stamp forgery
and can be held accountable. Because according to this theory if the stamp maker
knows that the stamp will be used by consumers for criminal acts then the stamp
maker is considered to be the cause in the case of the forgery of the stamp.
Keywords : Criminal Liability, Forgery, Stamp Maker, Doctrine Of Causality


Ketersediaan
#
Perpustakaan Universitas Riau 09 04. 120 (0246)
09 04. 120 (0246)
Tersedia
Informasi Detail
Judul Seri
-
No. Panggil
09 04. 120 (0246)
Penerbit
Pekanbaru : Universitas Riau – Fakultas Hukum – Hukum Pidana., 2020
Deskripsi Fisik
ix, 79 hlm.; ill.: 29 cm
Bahasa
Indonesia
ISBN/ISSN
-
Klasifikasi
09 04. 120 (0246)
Tipe Isi
-
Tipe Media
-
Tipe Pembawa
-
Edisi
-
Subjek
HUKUM PIDANA
Info Detail Spesifik
-
Pernyataan Tanggungjawab
Daus
Versi lain/terkait

Tidak tersedia versi lain

Lampiran Berkas
  • COVER
  • DAFTAR ISI
  • ABSTRAK
  • BAB I PENDAHULUAN
  • BAB II TINJAUAN PUSTAKA
  • BAB III HASIL PENELITIAN DAN PEMBAHASAN
  • BAB IV PENUTUP
  • DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Komentar

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar

Digilib Perpustakaan Universitas Riau
  • Informasi
  • Layanan
  • Pustakawan
  • Area Anggota

Tentang Kami

As a complete Library Management System, SLiMS (Senayan Library Management System) has many features that will help libraries and librarians to do their job easily and quickly. Follow this link to show some features provided by SLiMS.

Cari

masukkan satu atau lebih kata kunci dari judul, pengarang, atau subjek

Donasi untuk SLiMS Kontribusi untuk SLiMS?

© 2025 — Senayan Developer Community

Ditenagai oleh SLiMS
Pilih subjek yang menarik bagi Anda
  • Karya Umum
  • Filsafat
  • Agama
  • Ilmu-ilmu Sosial
  • Bahasa
  • Ilmu-ilmu Murni
  • Ilmu-ilmu Terapan
  • Kesenian, Hiburan, dan Olahraga
  • Kesusastraan
  • Geografi dan Sejarah
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Pencarian Spesifik
Kemana ingin Anda bagikan?