CD Skripsi

Kedudukan Kwitansi Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Jual Beli Tanah Di Pengadilan Negeri Rengat Kelas Ii

---

ABSTRACT
Even though national land law adopts the system of customary law, it has
been regulated strictly and real in Article 37 paragraph (1) The Government
Regulation Number 24 Year of 1997 about Land Registration, that buy and sell on
land object must be conducted in front of authorized officer in this case is Land Titles
Registrar (PPAT) and Article 2 Paragraph (1) Government Regulation Number 37
Year of 1998 about Position Regulation of Land Title Registrar (PPAT). In the state
court Class II of Rengat are there some civil disputes in which the plaintiff and
defendant did buy and sell land with invoice as the payment evidence and transfer of
rights. The writing of this undergraduate thesis aims to: first, find out the invoice
position as the evidence in land buy and sell at State Court Class II of Rengat;
second, the judge consideration in the civil disputes on the invoice usage as the
evidence in land buy and sell at State Court Class II of Rengat.
The type of this research could be categorized into sociology research. This
research was conducted at State Court Class II of Rengat, Indragiri Hulu Regency,
while the population and samples were the parties related to the problem investigated
in this research. Data collection was conducted by using interview method and library
study. Data analysis was conducted by using qualitative data analysis and in taking
conclusion the author used deductive method.
The research result and discussion; first, the invoice as evidence of receiving
money established by the parties can be used as written evidence based on Article
164 HIR/284 R.Bg. The invoice made is signed below by the parties as the written
evidence (letter underhand) on land buy and sell as the initial evidence is not a strong
enough. Therefore, the judge conducted material proving and place cheking on the
dispute object; second, the judge consideration in The Decree Number:
01/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Rgt, Decree Number: 15/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Rgt, Decree Number:
14/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Rgt, Decree Number: 1/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Rgt, in his consideration
the judge accepted the receipt as evidence under the hand by looking at the buyer who
has good intentions for the legal act of buying and selling carried out in order to get
justice for the rights that should be owned by the buyer, so as to produce benefits for
the further juridical delivery with legal actions behind the name of the old owner to
the owner the new one by recording the transfer of the Certificate of Ownership at
The Office of National Land Agency. The author’s suggesion; first, it is better that
the evidence of land buy and sell is an authentic evidence in the form of Deed of Sale
and Purchase (AJB) issued by PPAT because it has binding and perfect proof until
the judge is binded to the truth proved by the deed. Second, the parties who make the
sale and purchase should be prepared for the possibility in the future if the
whereabouts of the seller are not known when recording the transfer of rights so that
the buyer is required to the require a court decision on the sale and purchase of land
which is only proven by receipt.
Keywords: Invoice Position-Evidence-Land Buy and Sell at State Court

---

Ketersediaan

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

-

No. Panggil

09 04. 122 (0011)

Penerbit

Pekanbaru : Universitas Riau – Fakultas Hukum – Hukum Pidana., 2022

Deskripsi Fisik

xii, 29 hlm.; ill.: 29 cm

Bahasa

Indonesia

ISBN/ISSN

-

Klasifikasi

09 04. 122 (0011)

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

-

Subjek

HUKUM PIDANA

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

Daus

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar