CD Tesis
Rekonseptualisasi Eksekusi Illegal Fishing Oleh Menteri Perikanan Dan Kelautan Dikaitkan Dengan Upaya Peningkatan Pendapatan Negara
The case of Illegal Fishing in Indonesia itself seems to have received less
attention from the Indonesian government itself. Even though the crime of Illegal
Fishing in the EEZ (Exclusive Economic Zone) of Indonesia resulted in significant
losses for the Indonesian government. In addition, fisheries resources in
Indonesia are still a source of wealth that provides a very large possibility to be
developed for the prosperity of the Indonesian people, both to meet the protein
needs of its people, as well as for export purposes in order to obtain funds for the
nation's development efforts. The issue of Illegal Fishing by foreign ships is not a
mere loss of fishery resources, but also a matter of violating state sovereignty
which is a very principle thing, for that law enforcement and our sovereignty must
really be upheld. This is because in the policy of handling the execution of illegal
fishing, there are still many shortcomings, both in terms of rules and authority,
and the lack of coordination between law enforcement officers. Problem
Formulation What are the Weaknesses of Current Policies in Overcoming Illegal
Fishing Practices in Indonesian Waters, How Ideally Policies in Overcoming
Illegal Fishing Practices in Indonesian Waters Are Linked to Efforts to Increase
State Revenue. The method used is normative legal research with a Legislative
approach to the crime of Illegal Fishing. The results of the study conclude that the
weakness of the policy is to overcome the practice of illegal fishing. First, in the
aspect of legal vacuum related to the application of criminal sanctions in
confinement that are not enforced, and the absence of alternative punishments as
stated in the law. If you are unable to pay the food fine, you will be sentenced to
imprisonment. Second, the lack of coordination between law enforcement officers,
namely the National Police, the Navy, and the PSDKP regarding the scope and
respective authorities and responsibilities. Third, there are no clear SOPs related
to sinking and ship auctions. Fourth, the SOP for the repatriation of foreigners
who do illegal fishing in the EEZ waters has not been clearly regulated by
immigration. Meanwhile, ideally the policy of overcoming the practice of illegal
fishing is associated with efforts to increase state revenue by reforming the law on
Law Number 45 of 2009 concerning fisheries, especially in the strategy of
creating a law that is both in accordance with current and future conditions in
tackling illegal fishing in Indonesia's EEZ. All captured ships that still have
economic value are used as state income and which are not executed immediately
to be destroyed. Then the preparation of the SOP for the Coordination of
Investigations between the Police, the Navy, and the PSDKP against vessels
carrying out illegal fishing, as well as the SOP for the repatriation of foreigners.
Key Words: Execution; Illegal Fishing; Country income ;
Tidak tersedia versi lain