CD Skripsi

Analisis Yuridis Putusan Bawaslu Nomor 02/Reg/L/Tsm-Pw/08.00/Xii/2020 Tentang Diskualifikasi Terhadap Pemenang Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Kota Bandar Lampung

---

ABSTRACT
Indonesia is a constitutional state that adheres to democracy and a system
of government based on people's sovereignty. The most substantial understanding
of democracy is general election (election). Elections are a means to elect
people's representatives who will control the wheels of government. Elections are
held by the General Election Commission (KPU). KPU is domiciled at the center
or in the regions. The KPU at the regional level is tasked with holding elections at
the regional level, one of which is the Regional Head Election (Pilkada). So far,
the Pilkada implementation has been inseparable from the obstacles and
challenges that have occurred. Starting from the implementation, as well as
violations committed by the candidates themselves. So that maximum supervision
and monitoring is needed by Bawaslu. One of the Pilkada problems that occurred
in Bandar Lampung City, Lampung Bawaslu stated that Candidate Pair serial
number 03, Eva Dwiana-Deddy Amarullah had been proven to have violated the
Structured, Systematic, Massive Administration (TSM) in the 2020 Bandar
Lampung Pilkada, so that this pair was canceled from participating in the Bandar
Lampung Pilkada.
This research belongs to the normative juridical, namely research
conducted by examining secondary legal materials or research based on standard
rules that have been recorded and discusses legal principles and synchronization.
The data sources used are primary data, secondary data and tertiary data with
library research data collection techniques.
The resarch results obtained, should The Supreme Court as the first legal
remedy in making a decision must review the legality of letters or policies issued
by KPU Bandar Lampung and be considered by judges in canceling election
results, because they can endanger democracy and damage the morality of voters
in Bandar Lampung City in the future. Then for the Arrangement of Bawaslu
Authority in receiving violations of TSM reportsthere must be a
systemreinforcement of the Bawaslu with the actions of the Bawaslu in deciding a
dispute the process is final. This is done in order to maximize the implementation
of authorityquasi-judicial, in the form of an adjudication function so that Bawaslu
can decide on election administration violations, decide on money politics
violations, and election process disputes without further appeals. If it turns out
that Bawaslu is proven to have made a mistake in establishing or issuing a
decision, it will immediately be processed by the DKPP (Election Organizer
Honorary Council) so that election process disputes do not get more protracted
and do not need to go to court, and the election dispute mechanism can be
resolved quickly and efficiently.
Keywords: Election, Bawaslu, Pilkada

---

Ketersediaan

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

-

No. Panggil

1709110296

Penerbit

Pekanbaru : Universitas Riau – Fakultas Hukum – Hukum Tata Negara., 2023

Deskripsi Fisik

-

Bahasa

Indonesia

ISBN/ISSN

-

Klasifikasi

1709110296

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

-

Subjek

HUKUM TATA NEGARA

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

DAUS

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar