CD Tesis

Penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 Tentang Penyelesaian Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan (Tipiring) Dan Jumlah Denda Dalam Kuhp Pada Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dikaitkan Aspek Keadilan Bagi Korban

---

Perma No. 2 of 2012 reap the pros and cons. Of course the pros and cons
are inseparable from the point of view that is used as a foothold. Debate over
Perma No. 2 of 2012 seems to have led to the birth of Perma No. 2 of 2012, as
reported by a number of media, specifically efforts to foster a sense of community
justice, particularly in the resolution of cases involving minor offenses (Tipiring).
The fundamental question of the issuance of Perma No. 2 of 2012 will provide a
sense of justice for the community, especially the victims of the tipping.
Technically the law which is called Tipiring is a criminal act punishable by
imprisonment or imprisonment for a maximum of three months and or a fine of up
to seven thousand five hundred rupiahs and light insult. Therefore, the substance
of Perma No. 2 of 2012 actually does not depend on the value of the rupiah, but
on crimes that carry a maximum legal threat of 3 months and do not need to be
detained.
The formulation of the problem in the research is Is the Application of
Perma No. 2 of 2012 can fulfill the sense of justice on the part of victims of petty
theft, and what is the legal position of Perma No. 2 of 2012 in the crime of light
theft.
Based on the problems raised, the type of legal research used by
researchers is empirical or sociological legal research, and can also be called
field research.
Implementation of Perma No. 2 of 2012 did not run smoothly because from
the point of view it was used as a foothold. Problems with the implementation of
Perma No. 2 of 2012, is a form of effort to provide a sense of justice for the
community, especially for minor criminal cases in the settlement of minor
criminal cases (Tipiring) which still face pros and cons, due to the emergence of
doubts due to the issuance of Perma No. 2 of 2012 can guarantee justice for
special communities for victims of these minor crimes, because with the
implementation of Perma No. 2 of 2012 it is feared that there will be many crimes
or criminal acts whose fines amount to under Rp. 2,500,000.- (two million five
hundred thousand rupiah) and the crime of stealing money with a value of less
than Rp. 2,500,000.- (two million five hundred thousand rupiah). The position of
the Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 itself is an obstacle for the
judiciary and police institutions to comply with the provisions regarding the
limitation of minor crimes as contained in Perma No. 2 of 2012, because these
provisions can only be applied internally in the Supreme Court.

---

Ketersediaan

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

-

No. Panggil

2010247330

Penerbit

Pekanbaru : Universitas Riau – Pascasarjana – Tesis Ilmu Hukum., 2023

Deskripsi Fisik

-

Bahasa

Indonesia

ISBN/ISSN

-

Klasifikasi

2010247330

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

-

Subjek

ILMU HUKUM

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

FATAH

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar