CD Tesis
Pengelolaan Barang Rampasan Untuk Dimanfaatkan Sebagai Aset Negara
The loot management system is not managed by one door, this makes each agency feel that they have the authority to manage loot. In accordance with the provisions contained in the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 16 of 2014 it is managed by the Rupbasan while the State Attorney is managed by the Administrative Affairs Sub-Division. As for the formulation of the first problem, How is the System for Managing Confiscated Goods as a State Asset Between the Attorney General and Rupbasan, second, How is the Idea of Managing Confiscated Goods as a State Asset Linked to the Purpose of Legal Benefits. The research method in this thesis uses normative legal research, namely research with library research. The results of the research show that the system for the Management of Confiscated Goods as State Assets between the Attorney General's Office and Rupbasan is the Attorney General's Office through Circular Letter of the Attorney General Number SE-03/B/8.5/8/1988. Meanwhile, the Rupbasan management places objects that must be kept for the purposes of evidence in examinations at the level of investigation, prosecution and examination at court hearings, including items declared confiscated based on a judge's decision. Management of State Confiscated Objects and State Confiscated Goods in Indonesia based on Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia No. M.HH.-01.PR.01.01 of 2010 concerning the Strategic Plan of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights for 2010-2014. The idea of managing confiscated goods as state assets is associated with the objective of legal benefit, namely having to work hard in optimizing the confiscation by completing facilities and infrastructure in storing and caring for the loot so that it remains of high value, as well as with a technological approach. To carry out this purpose, it is necessary to have adequate budgetary support and to recruit employees who have competence in their field of expertise as evidenced by certification. At the prosecutor's office it is also hoped that it will be able to maximize the execution of evidence, give people rights to evidence that has been decided to be returned, contribute PNBP to evidence confiscated for the state, carry out proper execution of evidence that is destroyed, carry out the task function from the authority of the public prosecutor in domitus litis as executor of execution.
Keywords: Attorney; Rupbasan; Confiscated Goods;
Tidak tersedia versi lain