CD Skripsi
Problematika Hukum Putusan Rechterlijk Pardon Dalam Sistem Pemidanaan Di Indonesia
The background of the concept of rechterlijk pardon is rooted in the prevalence of defendants who have actually fulfilled the burden of proof, but sentencing them would result in a conflict between legal certainty and justice. On the other hand, the qualification procedure for rechterlijk pardon must be strictly regulated to ensure that pardons are not granted without guidelines, given the wide discretion available to judges. Rechterlijk pardon in the penal system primarily concerns the imposition of penalties where judges may decide not to impose a sentence on proven guilty defendants based on the goals of sentencing.
The analysis employs normative research using a qualitative approach, specifically conceptual and legislative approaches, to uncover how judges weigh decisions and the constraints that govern judges in rechterlijk pardon rulings.
The findings of this research suggest that legal reasoning by judges must align with moral reasons consistent with Pancasila values and civilized law, and should focus on individualizing punishment and subsociality in formulating sentencing goals. Sentencing guidelines are intended as a controlling function. The highly individual characteristics of criminal cases should be autonomously justified with sufficient consideration of legal principles and the principle of culpa in causa.
Keywords: Rechterlijk Pardon, Verdict, Penal System
Tidak tersedia versi lain