CD Skripsi

Disparitas Pidana Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Hasil Tindak Pidana Narkotika

---

Criminal sanctions aim to give preferential suffering to the offender so that he felt as a result of perbuatanya. In addition aimed at imposing suffering against the perpetrators, criminal sanctions also constitute a statement of disapproval against offenders act. In the case of money laundering narcotics proceeds of crime, criminal sanctions is necessary as a deterrent effect imposed by the judge to the perpetrators of money laundering narcotics proceeds of crime. But often found differences in criminal sanctions against the judge imposed the same case, or better known as the Criminal Disparities resulting in the emergence of injustice. This study examines the problems of (1) How is the construction of thinking judges in decisions in the case of money laundering narcotics proceeds of crime in the case Number: 593 / PID / SUS / 2012 / PN.PBR and case Number: 258 / PID / SUS / 2014 /PN.PBR? (2) Are the causes of disparty verdict against money laundering narcotics proceeds of crime. The goal in this study to determine construction think judges in imposing criminal verdict in the case Number: 593 / PID / SUS / 2012 / PN.PBR and case Number: 258 / PID / SUS / 2014 / PN.PBR? and also to determine the factors that cause disparities verdict against money laundering narcotics proceeds of crime. The source of the data used is secondary data standard rules that have been recorded. In this study the authors used a qualitative descriptive analysis is a method of analysis results in the form of literature to the depiction of the problems with using theories and menguraikanya in the form of sentences and concluded with the deductive method. From the results of this study concluded (1) that in case Number: 593 / PID / SUS / 2012 / PN.PBR defendant is proven guilty of money laundering as stipulated in Law No. 8 of 2010 with sentenced to imprisonment for 3 (three) years and a fine Rp.800.000.000, - and in case Number: 258 / PID / SUS / 2014 / PN.PBR defendant was legally commit money laundering continues, the defendant shall be sentenced to prison for 1 ( one) year 2 (two) months and a fine of Rp. 100.000.000, -. (2) The cause of the disparity verdict against the same criminal act caused by the law itself factors, factors resources law enforcement officials, a factor of self-judge itself (both internal and external) and also the factors of the situation inside the defendant. This study suggested that the government mengandemen Law on Money Laundering which so no criminal classification is based on the type of predicate offenses, the amount of money obtained from the predicate offense, and specifically for money laundering predicate crime that his narcotic crime to establish regulations for the amount and type of drugs so that the judge in making the interpretation of the statute can be limited. Keywords: Disparities, Crime, Money Laundering.

---

Ketersediaan

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

-

No. Panggil

09 04. 115 (0068)

Penerbit

Pekanbaru : Universitas Riau - Fakultas Hukum - Hukum Pidana., 2015

Deskripsi Fisik

viii, 76 hlm.: ill.; 29 cm

Bahasa

ISBN/ISSN

-

Klasifikasi

09 04. 115 (0068)

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

-

Subjek

HUKUM PIDANA

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

DAUS

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar