CD Skripsi
Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 1-2/Puu-Xii/2014 Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 Tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2013 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003
Pros and cons associated Perppu No. 1 in 2013 so that the Court conduct a judicial review against the Perppu, in which the Court granted the request of the applicant. Then the Constitutional Court to the Constitutional Court Decision No. 1-2 / PUU-XII / cancel 2014 Act No. 4 of 2014 on Presidential Decree No. 1 of 2013 on the Second Amendment to Law on the Constitutional Court. Court reasoned that the articles contained in the Constitutional Law No. 4 of 2014 which previously was Perppu, contrary to the constitution of 1945 Constitution Based on this understanding, this thesis formulates the two formulation of the problem, namely: First, What is the background of juridical verdict Constitutional Court No. 1-2 / PUU-XII / 2014 on Judicial Review of Law No. 4 of 2014 concerning Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 1 Year 2013 on the Second Amendment Act No. 24 of 2003? Secondly, How analysis Constitutional Court Decision No. 1-2 / PUU-XII / 2014 on Testing Act No. 4 of 2014 on Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 1 Year 2013 on the Second Amendment Act No. 24 of 2003?
The research method in this study, first, the type of research is a descriptive and normative legal analysis. Second, the data sources, supported by the primary data source, secondary data sources and tertiary data sources. Third, the data collection techniques used are literature studies. After the data collected was then analyzed qualitatively, and then draw conclusions with deductive method of thinking is to analyze the problems of the general form into specific shapes.
From the research, there are two main problems that can be concluded, first, the reason for the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 1-2 / PUU / XI / 2014 including the reasons for formal and material reasons Then reasons. Both pros and cons related to the emergence of Perppu No. 1 in 2013 so that the Court conduct a judicial review against the Perppu, in which the Court granted the request of the applicant and issue a Constitutional Court Decision No. 1-2 / PUU-XII / cancel 2014 Act No. 4 of 2014 on Presidential Decree No. 1 of 2013 on the Second Amendment to Law on the Constitutional Court. Court reasoned that the articles contained in the Constitutional Law No. 4 of 2014 which previously was Perppu, contrary to the 1945 Constitution.
Keywords: Decision -Mahkamah Constitution - Perppu
Tidak tersedia versi lain