CD Tesis
Rekonseptualisasi Eksekusi Putusan Uang Pengganti Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Upaya Peningkatan Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak
The provision of additional penalties in the form of criminal compensation money is very good in returning State / Regional losses (Asset Recovery) from criminal acts of corruption committed by State Administration Officials, however, not all of the state's money returns can go well, Corruption perpetrators tend to undergo punishment additional than paying a criminal replacement money. Regarding the replacement money for acts of corruption by the defendant, according to the provisions of Article 17 of the Corruption Act, besides being subject to criminal offenses as referred to in Article 2, Article 3, Article 5 to Article 14, the defendant may be subject to additional penalties as referred to in Article 18 The Problem Formulation of How the Arrangement of Replacement Money Execution in Corruption Cases Is Associated With Efforts to Increase Non-Tax State Revenues Nowadays, the Concept of Arrangement of Replacement Money Execution in Corruption Cases is Associated with Efforts to Increase Non-Tax State Revenues. This type of research is a Normative Legal Research with a case study approach to substitute money in corruption cases which will later be analyzed against legal principles by referring to the legal norms contained in legislation relating to the title of this scientific work. . The results of the study are restitution of state financial losses, among others, regulated in Article 32, Article 33 and Article 34 and Article 38 of Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law No. 31 of 1999. These provisions provide a legal basis for the state represented by the State Attorney Attorney or the aggrieved agency to conduct a civil suit against corruptors. Payment of substitute money is only dependent on conditions, namely the seizure of assets obtained from criminal acts of corruption by the defendant and third parties (other parties) according to the provisions of Article 18 paragraph (1) letter b jo. Article 19 paragraph (1) of the Anti-Corruption Act, is insufficient to cover state financial losses arising from criminal acts of corruption.
Keywords: Corruption; Replacement Money; Execution; Reconceptualization;
Tidak tersedia versi lain