CD Tesis
Reformulasi Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Kaitan Rendahnya Realisasi Keuangan Negara Di Bidang Pembangunan Dikarenakan Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Jo Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
In the development of law enforcement in Indonesia recently that massive against corruption began the results. However, in the past few years the total absorption of budget revenue and expenditure and areas in Indonesia is far from optimal, it is regarded as an obstacle in the development and future development of Indonesia. Many obstacles to the absorption of the budget should certainly be able to be overcome by the government, because if these obstacles can lead to decreased left its forecast for economic growth in Indonesia. One is considered a bottleneck in the budget absorption it is the fear of the stakeholders at the regional and central levels in running projects that have been planned, fears the policy makers is because the officials of power holders are afraid to take that step would later in connexion with the acts of corruption. The purpose of this thesis, namely; First, to determine the causes of delays in development projects in relation to Article 3 of Law No. 31 of 1999 Jo Act No. 20 of 2001 on Corruption Eradication, Second, to find out ideally Article 3 of Law No. 31 of 1999 Jo Act oF No. 20 of 2001 on Corruption Eradication if it is associated with impaired development projects. The method used in this research is a kind of normative juridical research, the research done by examining secondary law or research based on the standard rules that has been recorded is also called the research literature.
From the research, based on two formulation of the problem can be inferred. First, the cause of inhibition of development projects in relation to Article 3 of Law No. 31 of 1999 Jo Act No. 20 of 2001 on Corruption Eradication is, the reluctance of the state that has an important role in accelerating the development program to implement or make policy and discretion in order to accelerate the development process. This arises because the number of policy and discretion made by countries brought into the realm of criminal law corruption that led to criminal penalties. Second, ideally Article 3 of Law No. 31 of 1999 Jo Act No. 20 of 2001 on Corruption Eradication if it is associated with impaired development projects is, in its application to prioritize administrative process if the state apparatus is doing an offense in terms of making a policy or discretionary, making it clear which is the criminal corrupt administration and which is an act of administrative violation in running a government.
Keywords: Reformulation - Crime - Corruption - Absorption - Finance - State
Tidak tersedia versi lain