CD Tesis
Gagasan Integrasi Penyelesaian Penipuan Yang Berawal Dari Perjanjian Dikaitkan Dengan Konsep Restorative Justice
This study focuses the research objectives on three categories, namely analyzing and describing the differences between fraud and default in Indonesian positive law, law enforcement against fraud and default in court decisions in Indonesia, and the ideal concept of regulating fraud in policy criminal law in Indonesia. The type of this research is normative legal research. Judging from its nature, this research is descriptive, which describes clearly and in detail about the idea of integration of fraud settlement that originates from an agreement associated with the concept of restorative justice.
The difference between the crime of fraud and default in Indonesian positive law is that fraud is included in the realm of Criminal Law and the perpetrators are threatened and can be sentenced to prison, while default is included in the realm of Civil Law and the penalty is only compensation. Law enforcement against criminal acts of fraud and default in court decisions in Indonesia is that there is no common understanding and interpretation regarding the matter of applying the concept of default and fraud. In essence, the partial fulfillment of the contents of the agreement does not lead to a broken promise/default. The ideal concept of setting criminal acts of fraud in criminal law policies in Indonesia is: First, revise the Criminal Code. Second: apply the ADR concept in fraud cases related to contractual/contractual relationships. Third, there is the same interpretation or interpretation of law enforcers in the case.
Keywords: Fraud, Default, Restorative Justice
Tidak tersedia versi lain