CD Tesis
Informed Consent Dokter Dan Pasien Berdasarkan Asas Good Faith
An informed consent agreement must be carried out in good faith. This principle is the principle that the parties, namely the creditors and debtors must carry out the substance of the contract based on the trust or firm belief or goodwill of the parties. This paper discusses the informed consent of Doctors and Patients based on the Good Faith principle and the legal consequences of not implementing the informed consent of Doctors and Patients based on the Good Faith principle. The research method is a normative legal research study of the principle of law, researchers collect data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary data. Data collection techniques, namely interviews and literature review. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively and drawing conclusions from the author using deductive thinking methods.
The conclusion of this study is that informed consent between doctors and patients must be based on the principle of good faith, for physicians informed consent to provide a sense of security in carrying out medical actions against patients. For patients, informed consent is an embodiment of the patient's right where the patient has the right to get information about the disease he is suffering from, what medical action he wants to take, the likelihood that will occur in making a decision on medical action. If no informed consent results in failure to fulfill one of the terms of the agreement under Article 1320 of the Civil Code, it is classified as a default and is classified as unlawful pursuant to Article 1365 of the Civil Code.
Keywords: Informed Consent, Good Faith, Doctors and Patients.
Tidak tersedia versi lain