CD Skripsi

Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Perkara Nomor 47/Pid.B/2018/Pn Mandailing Natal Pada Korban Salah Tangkap Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana

---

ABSTRACT
One of the problems that occur in the Criminal Justice System is the violation of rights
at one or all levels of examination. These violations can be in the form of procedural
violations, administrative violations, personal violations of the suspect to serious violations
such as the fabrication of witnesses and the fabrication of evidence of a case. If a suspect's
information which is allegedly committed a criminal act is used as evidence for the
investigator, it turns out that the acquisition is based on pressure or coercion that results in
psychological and physical suffering and creates fear. Acquisition of information as evidence
must be declared invalid because it may contain an engineered confession. Violations of
procedures and misidentification of victims of criminal acts that still occur today are seen as
a result of the weak professionalism of law enforcement officers. Cases of wrong procedures
and wrong investigations can lead to errors in determining the culprit or what is often called
a wrong arrest. This happened in Case Number 47 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN Mandailing Natal.
The purpose of writing this thesis, namely: first, knowing juridical analysis of Decision
Number 47 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN Mandailing Natal on victims of wrongful arrest based on Law
Number 8 of 1981 concerning KUHAP. Second, knowing the basic analysis of judges'
consideration of Case Decision Number 47 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN Mandailing Natal for victims
of wrongful arrests under Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning KUHAP.
The type of research used in this legal research is the normative juridical method.
Therefore, it is used an analysis with a qualitative measure based on the substance of the
data collection in drawing conclusions. In drawing conclusions the author uses the method
of deductive thinking, which is a way of thinking that draws a conclusion from things that
are general to things that are specific.
From the results of research and discussion it can be concluded, first, the existence of
law enforcement officers who are not professional in carrying out their duties in accordance
with the provisions of Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning KUHAP. Second, the judge in deciding
a criminal case must consider the formal requirements of evidence and regarding the
strength of evidence the judge must see firsthand whether there is correspondence between
one and another evidence, the judge should look at the facts that occur in the trial.
Keywords: Criminal Justice System, Wrong Arrest, Decision.

---

Ketersediaan

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

-

No. Panggil

09 04. 120 (0101)

Penerbit

Pekanbaru : Universitas Riau – Fakultas Hukum – Pidana., 2020

Deskripsi Fisik

ix, 79 hlm.; ill.: 29 cm

Bahasa

Indonesia

ISBN/ISSN

-

Klasifikasi

09 04. 120 (0101)

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

-

Subjek

HUKUM PIDANA

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

Daus

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar