CD Skripsi
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pidana Uang Pengganti Untuk Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Dalam Putusan Perkara Nomor:01/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2018/Pn.Pdg
In the Criminal Act Article 18 paragraph (1) of Law Number 3 of 1999
concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts. In practice, there are still many
problems in judicial punishment, both in its regulation and in the criminal
prosecution of corruption together. The judge dropped the loan of money to the
defendant. The purpose of this thesis discussion, namely: First, find a solution to
the problem of money in terms of the results of criminal acts of corruption that
have been received by other parties. Secondly, to find out the death of money to
free up state deficiencies in the Case Decision Number: 01 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2018 /
PN.Pdg
This type of research is normative legal research. This research is more
specific to the principle research on the court's decision by reviewing, analyzing
and analyzing various related literature that also discusses interviews with
Kasubsi Extraordinary Efforts and Execution of the Special Crimes of the Padang
District Attorney.
From the results of the research conducted, it can be concluded, First,
regulating the court of money regulation Article 18 paragraph (1) letter b of Law
Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning
Eradication of Corruption Crimes. Money Payment Regulations Regional
Regulation Number 5 of 2014 concerning Supplementary Criminal Additional
Money in Corruption Acts. While in terms of accountability for the results of
corruption that have been received by other parties, there is no regulation in the
Anti-Corruption Law also in Perma. Second, Judging from the aspect of payment
in this case, the Judge did not consider the defendant's mistake and role so that he
could not make a big difference, benefit and proportionality for the community or
for the defendant, in accordance with the objectives of the conviction.
Author's Suggestions, First, the Judge should consider the facts that have
been revealed in court in order to provide justice by providing appropriate and
proportionate punishment for the defendant to provide justice for the coverage
and the victim. Second, in giving sentence to the defendant, the Judge should pay
attention to the usefulness of the sentence.
Keywords: Judicial Review-Criminal Replacement Money
Tidak tersedia versi lain