CD Skripsi

Penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 Tentang Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan Dan Jumlah Denda Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Pada Kasus Penipuan Dan Penggelapan Di Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru

---

Over time, fraud and embezzlement have become the most common
crime. Minor fraud and light embezzlement with a value of less than Rp.
2,500,000.00 which was tried in court was enough to attract the attention of the
public. The general public considers that it is very unfair if the cases are
threatened with a sentence of 4 (four years) imprisonment as regulated in articles
378 and 372 of the Criminal Code because it is not proportional to the monetary
value of the crimes committed. So the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia
deems it necessary to issue a Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of
Indonesia to adjust the value of money which is a limitation of minor criminal
offenses. Then the Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2012
was issued concerning the Adjustment of Limits of Minor Crimes and the Number
of Fines in the Criminal Code. The purpose of this thesis is: First, to find out the
Implementation of Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 in the Pekanbaru
District Court. Second, to find out the legal consequences of the Judges' decision
if they do not apply Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012.
This type of research can be classified in this type of sociological juridical
research, because this research author directly conduct research on the locations
or places studied in order to give a complete and clear picture of the issues
examined. This research was conducted at the Pekanbaru District Court, whereas
the sample population is a whole party with regard to the issues examined in this
study, the data source used, primary data, secondary data and data tertiary,
technical data collectors in this study with interviews and literature study.
From the results of the research and discussion it can be concluded that,
First, the application of the Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2012 in the Fraud
and Embezzlement Cases in the Pekanbaru District Court has not been going well
and optimally, this can be seen from the results of research conducted by the
author, namely the Judges' Court The State of Pekanbaru in handling minor
criminal cases still often does not apply PERMA Number 2 of 2012. Second, the
consequences for Judges if they do not apply PERMA Number 2 of 2012 can be
subject to sanctions by the Supreme Court, because if judges do not apply PERMA
Number 2 of 2012 in adjudicate a misdemeanor then it violates the Code of Ethics
and / or the Code of Conduct of judge point C about behaving fairly in section 8.
Keywords: Implementationv – Supreme Court Rules – Fraud - Embezzlement

---

Ketersediaan

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

-

No. Panggil

09 04. 120 (0137)

Penerbit

Pekanbaru : Universitas Riau – Fakultas HUKUM – HUKUM PIDANA., 2020

Deskripsi Fisik

xii, 29 hlm.; ill.: 29 cm

Bahasa

Indonesia

ISBN/ISSN

-

Klasifikasi

09 04. 120 (0137)

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

-

Subjek

HUKUM PERDATA BISNIS

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

Daus

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar