CD Tesis
Implementasi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 Tentang Penyesuaian Batas Tindak Pidana Ringan Dan Jumlah Denda Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Siak Tahun 2016 Dari Sudut Pandang Teori Keadilan
This study aims to analyze the Implementation of the Implementation of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 as well as the Constraints in the Implementation of the Implementation of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 concerning Adjustment of Minor Crime Limits and the Amount of Fines in the Criminal Code against Theft in the Legal Territory of the Court. Negeri Siak from a Justice Theory Point of View. This study uses sociological legal research methods, namely direct research to the research location using data collection tools in the form of interviews.
The results show that the implementation of the implementation of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 concerning Adjustment of Minor Crime Limits and the Amount of Fines in the Criminal Code in the Legal Territory of the Siak District Court from a Justice Theory Point of View that with the enactment of PERMA No. 02 of 2012 concerning Adjustment of the Limits of Minor Crimes and the Amount of Fines in the Criminal Code, has changed the rules of the game for adjusting the limits of Minor Crimes, to cases contained in Article 364, Article 373, Article 379, Article 384, Article 407 and, Article 482 which was originally limited to a minimum Rp. 250, - (two hundred and fifty rupiah) to Rp. 2,500,000.00, - (two million five hund red thousand rupiah), Constraints in the Implementation of the Implementation of Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 concerning Adjustment of Minor Crime Limits and Amount of Fines in the Criminal Code in the Legal Territory of the Siak District Court from the Theory of Justice Point of View that the existence of PERMA Number 2 of 2012 concerning Adjustment of Minor Criminal Actions and the amount of fines in the Criminal Code at the Siak District District Court has not been effectively applied because the socialization of the PERMA is deemed insufficient and incomplete, causing legal officials such as the Police and the Attorney Office to be reluctant to apply the PERMA. Even though there has been a memorandum of understanding between the Supreme Court, the Police and the Attorney General's Office, there are still some legal officials in the Siak District judiciary who do not know about the PERMA.
Keywords: PERMA No. 2 of 2012, PN Theft Criminal. Siak, Theory of Justice.
Tidak tersedia versi lain