CD Tesis
Efektivitas Pembelajaran Kolaboratif Melalui Teknik Group Investigation (GI) Dan Think Pair Share (TPS) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Self Efficacy Siswa SMA/MA Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia
Research that has been done is the Effectiveness of Collaborative Learning
Through Group Investigation (GI) and Think Pair Share (TPS) Techniques on
Critical Thinking Ability and Self Efficacy of High School / MA Students on
Chemical Equilibrium Material. This research is motivated by the value of the
learning outcomes of students 'critical thinking skills in the chemical balance
material which is still low, the ability to think critically and students' self-efficacy
when the learning process is still not well implemented. Therefore it is necessary
to apply strategies in the learning process, one of which is to apply collaborative
learning which can train students' ability to solve a problem by increasing critical
thinking skills. and can present the results of solving problems confidently (self
efficacy) so that students find material concepts that can improve the value of
their learning outcomes.
The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in the Critical Thinking
Ability and Self Efficacy of students who are taught using two different
collaborative learning techniques, namely Collaborative Learning through Group
Investigation (GI) Techniques and Think Pair Share (TPS). The research method
used is the Quasy Experiment (Quasi Experiment) with the research design used
is non-equivalent control postest design. The sample in this study amounted to 65
students consisting of class XI SAINS 1, XI SAINS 2 and XI SAINS 3 who were
taken using cluster sampling technique.
Data collection techniques were carried out quantitatively and qualitatively.
Quantitatively, the instruments used in this study were 5 essay choice test
questions, and 25 validated self-efficacy questionnaires each. The test was carried
out in order to obtain the sample value of the experimental group after being
treated. The experimental group 1 used collaborative learning with GI techniques,
the experimental group 2 used TPS collaborative learning and group 3 used the
control class.
The analysis technique used for validation is to use Pearson Product Moment,
then the valid items are tested for reliability using Alpha Cronbach. Before the
hypothesis test is carried out, there is a prerequisite test that must be met, namely
the data normality test using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov. Then the variance /
covariance homogeneity test was performed. After that, to find out whether there
is a relationship between the dependent variables, a correlation test is performed
using the Pearson correlation. To test the extent of the causal relationship
between the independent variables and the dependent variable. Linear regression
test was used. After the prerequisite test is met, the hypothesis test can be carried
xiii
out. to test the significant difference in critical thinking skills between learning
using Collaborative Learning through Group Investigation (GI) and Think Pair
Share (TPS) techniques which can be done by testing the hypothesis using the
independent sample t-test. to test the significant difference in self-efficacy between
learning using Collaborative Learning through Group Investigation (GI) and
Think Pair Share (TPS) techniques which can be done by testing the hypothesis
using the independent sample t-test. Then to find out whether there is an effect of
using it to test significant differences in critical thinking skills between learning
using Collaborative Learning through Group Investigation (GI) and Think Pair
Share (TPS) techniques on students' critical thinking skills and self-efficacy, the
Manova test is used.
Based on the results of the study, it was found that there was a significant
difference in the critical thinking skills of students taught by learning using
Collaborative Learning through Group Investigation (GI) and Think Pair Share
(TPS) 0.000
Tidak tersedia versi lain