CD Skripsi

Analisis Disparitas Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru Dengan No Perkara 14/Pid.Sus-Anak/2019/Pn Pbr Dan No Perkara 22/Pid.Sus-Anak/2019/Pn Pbr )

---

ABSTRACT
In the same case, law has different rules. In law, it is known as disparity
(disparity of sentencing). According to Oemar Seno Adji, disparity does what can
be justified as long as it is done naturally. In writing this thesis the author
discusses the problem of Criminal Disparity in cases of Criminal Abuse
committed by children in case No Case 14 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2019 / PN Pbr with
Case No Case 22 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2019 / PN Pbr. For the purpose of writing this
thesis, namely; First, we can find out the causes of the disparity in crimes
committed by judges in deciding criminal acts of maltreatment committed by
children. Second, we can find out the ideal sanctions given by judges to child
defendants.
The research method used is the normative juridical method in relation to
Restoratif justice. The results show that in deciding a case the judge is subject to
Article 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code, namely the judge must have his own
consideration in determining the severity or lightness of the sentence to be
imposed on the defendant, through material evidence in court to support the
conclusions in the judge's consideration.
The result of this study is that in deciding a case, a judge pays attention to
matters or methods properly and fairly without any political interests or personal
interests that can harm one of the parties. In the case of a criminal act of torture
committed by Anak Bintang Nusantara Als Bintang Bin Ali Basyah, et al, they are
subject to Article 170 Paragraph (2) Section 2e of the Criminal Code Jo Article
20 of Law no. 11 of 2012 by Judge ABDUL AZIZ, SH, M.HUM with 5 years in
prison, and against the defendant Anak Agusfah Yani Als Yani Binti Herman and
Anak II Rama Dani Als Rini Binti Herman, Judge Dahlia Panjaitan SH Wearing
Article 80 of the Criminal Code paragraph 1 KUHP in conjunction with Article
76 c of Law No. 35 of 2014 with 3 months in prison without considering
Restorative justice for the child of the Defendant.
Keywords: Disparities-Court Decisions-Judge-Restorative Judgments

---

Ketersediaan

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

-

No. Panggil

09 04. 121 (0124)

Penerbit

Pekanbaru : Universitas Riau – Fakultas HUKUM – HUKUM PIDANA., 2021

Deskripsi Fisik

ix, 79 hlm.; ill.: 29 cm

Bahasa

Indonesia

ISBN/ISSN

-

Klasifikasi

09 04. 121 (0124)

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

-

Subjek

HUKUM PIDANA

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

Daus

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar