CD Skripsi
Politik Hukum Ketentuan Pasal 27 Ayat (3) Undangundang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Dikaitkan Dengan Kebebasan Berpendapat
ABSTRACT
The development of information technology today is inseparable from the
era of globalization, one form of this technological progress can be seen from the
increasing number of trade transactions using online media via the internet. In
addition, through the internet, a person can communicate without being limited by
time and space so that it can be said that the internet is one of the channels for
people to express their opinions. However, it is unfortunate that the current
technological developments are not accompanied by a good mentality, it can be
seen from the many cases of defamation that have resulted in convictions. Starting
from the problem of mutual ridicule, criticism that is considered insulting, or the
spread of false information in the community (hoax). In such conditions it is
deemed necessary to give birth to the ITE Law, the birth of the ITE Law also
creates a polemic with the emergence of Article 27 Paragraph (3) which is
considered by many as a rubber article with the intention of silencing the freedom
of expression and opinion guaranteed in the constitution.
This type of research the writer uses is normative legal research.
Normative legal research is doctrinal legal research, also known as library
research or documentary study which focuses on secondary data. The data
collection technique in this research is literature study, in which the author takes
quotes from books, literature, or supporting books related to the problems to be
studied. In writing this thesis, the author uses descriptive analysis (descriptive
analysis) which aims to provide a description of the research subject based on
data obtained from the subject under study.
The results of this thesis research conclude that Article 27 paragraph (3)
of the ITE Law was entered suddenly at the last minute of the ratification of the
ITE Bill into Law without any prior basis for consideration. regarding the need to
formulate provisions regarding defamation and / or defamation where the main
objective of the ITE Law is to regulate online trade (e-commerce) and electronic
signatures (electronic signatures). The two freedom of opinion with social media
after the enactment of the ITE Law has the potential to paralyze the people's right
to express their aspirations in terms of expressing opinions, criticizing and
complaining even though these are human rights protected by the state.
Keywords: Political Law - Freedom of Opinion - ITE Law
Tidak tersedia versi lain