CD Skripsi

Pelaksanaan Diversi Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Di Kejaksaan Negeri Pekanbaru

---

ABSTRACT
The problem of implementing the diversion is not as expected, this can also be seen with the problem of the public prosecuting agency which is still breaking through the legal channels when in the process of law enforcement needed, whether approved, appropriate facilities and infrastructure, factors from the community, and factors from culture, in the diversion process that often happens conflicts between children in conflict with the law and victims. This study aims to study the procedures for implementing diversion against children in conflict with the law by the Public Prosecutor, and inhibiting factors in the implementation of diversion related to the solution. The research method used is the type of research in this study is juridical sociological. This type of research is a type of research that uses descriptive law. From the results of the research, the procedure for implementing the diversion by the Public Prosecutor is guided by two Laws Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System and the Attorney General's Regulation No.PER-006/A/J.A/05/2015 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversity at the Prosecution Level. The formulation of the problem in this research is the implementation of the diversion of children included in the Pekanbaru District Attorney's Office and the transfer in the implementation of the diversion of children followed up at the Pekanbaru District Attorney's Office.
Andre Siswandi and Romi Septriansyah wear article 363 Paragraph 2 in which this article was threatened with crimes 9 (nine) years ago when law enforcement officers broke through what was approved in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System while continuing to diversify in which case diversion is carried out with a requirement under 7 (seven) years and not as a repeat of a criminal offense. In addition, the implementation of diversion was also not between the parties and victims, but both parties did not want to heed what was asked by both parties. The conclusion of this study was not in accordance with the suitability between victims and victims so that it was in accordance with an agreement where it was difficult to carry out the diversion consideration. ineffective and inefficient both in terms of facilities and infrastructure where the space inside is still too small so that the process of reconciling between the protected and the victim becomes uncomfortable. Avoiding the difficulties of reconciling parties where the Beneficial victim needs to save the victim, lack of understanding of diversion, narrow space of diversion, and also law enforcers who participate in breaking through the law itself.
Keywords : Diversity Implementation, Law Enforcement

---

Ketersediaan

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

-

No. Panggil

09 04. 120 (0012)

Penerbit

Pekanbaru : Universitas Riau – Fakultas Hukum -Pidana., 2020

Deskripsi Fisik

ix, 77 hlm.; ill.: 29 cm

Bahasa

Indonesia

ISBN/ISSN

-

Klasifikasi

09 04. 120 (0012)

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

-

Subjek

HUKUM PIDANA

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

Daus

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar