CD Tesis
Konvergensi Kepemimpinan Adat Dan Pemerintah Kabupaten Kuantan Singingi
The features of convergence of indigenous leadership and
governance in Kuantan Singingi district are very influential in running the
government and the society lifeas can be seen from the perspective of
Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government and Law
Number 6 of 2014 concerning Village. Several things that are done
together can be called as convergence. The Governance and Indigenous
Leadership (datuak and niniak mamak) in custom society uphold the
customary values that prevail. Culture and customare significantly
influencing the running of the government as suchcompliance can be seen
in children, grandchildren, nephews/nieces towards customary. Customary
laws that put forward customary norms apply from the past to the present.
For example, the Pacu Jalur folk party which is held once a year is an
event ofcustom society and the Kuantan Singingi Government which is
held by the society. This activity is in the government’s agenda and
receives a budget from the Kuantan Singingi Government. The
establishment of convergence between indigenous leadership and
government is an interesting phenomenon for the nomination of political
leaders in the regions who take an emotional and political approach to
indigenous groups in each region.There are also several other features
such as the maternal descent system (materelineal), rights of inheritance,
grandchildren conflict, customary rights, pusako tinggi property, marriage,
and cultural ceremonies. Therefore, the author tried to find out the
convergence of custom in Kuantan Singingi Government.
Based on the research results, the Convergence which has remained
intact to date, including:. The convergence of the old Kuantan Singingi
indigenous leadership is an autonomous state by itself regarding the
aspects of society life. Furthermore, the customswere inherited from Malay
customs. The tribes in Kuantan Singingi consist of Malays, Piliang,
Chaniago, and Petopang (in Teluk Kuantan known as the nantigo tribe,
the nan ompek tribe, the nan limo tribe, and the nan onam tribe, which
reflects that the tribal names are not imitating Minangkabau). The
convergence in Kuantan, especially in KenegrianTaluk,falls in the local
wisdom of "bapilintigo rope, tigo tungku sejarangan" (alim ulama,
traditional head, and government) handling the problems of inheritances,
forest and livestock conflicts, customary rights,pusako tinggi property,
marriages, and ceremonial events (arts and folk parties) - these have long
been continuously converged between indigenous leadership and
government.
The Kenegerian traditional institution of Teluk Kuantan Bay was one
of the victims of the "equalization" policy by the New Order government.
xiii
This institution, which has always had a strategic role in society and
government, was eroded by theNew Order policy that "Java-nize"
Indonesia with its new government system. The roles of indigenous
leadership, ninik mamak, datuk, and godang were replaced by village
officials who work based on the political will of the government and the
political will of certain group. The reformation brought back the existence
of indigenous leadership in the midst of the societyand took the role of
converging joints of life whichhave always obeyed to the rules of
indigenous leadership.
In current condition of advanced society, Convergence of Indigenous
leadership and Kuantan Singingi Government is focused or divided in the
following matters: Nikah - Kawin Ceremony, Turun Tanah Ceremony,
Settlement of traditional disputes, Granting of customary titles, Customary
events such as Do’a Padang prayer, Pacu Palur, Giving advices to
husband and wife who are disputing, Deliberation of customary closeness,
Leadership Discussion of 9 Datuk,and other customary Activities
concerning Inheritances and Conflicts of land and livestock.
Traditional institutions and bureaucratic institutions are converged:
both traditional institutions and bureaucratic institutions can live and work
side by side in society. The two institutions are limited and separated
functionally, not geographically and hierarchically. The traditional and
bureaucracy institutions are separated based on hierarchical "spaces" of
authority. Traditional and bureaucracy institutions are separated and have
their own authorities and activity spaces.
Tidak tersedia versi lain