Image of Relevansi Hukum Pembentukan Perma No 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Persidangan Secara Elektronik Yang Mengganti Pasal 230 Kuhap Tentang Persidangan Secara Langsung
Penanda Bagikan

CD Skripsi

Relevansi Hukum Pembentukan Perma No 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Persidangan Secara Elektronik Yang Mengganti Pasal 230 Kuhap Tentang Persidangan Secara Langsung

This research analyzes the legal relevance of the formation of Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 1 of 2019 concerning Case Administration and Trial Electronically in Court. Prior to the creation of PERMA No. 1 of 2019, traditional court proceedings (in-person hearings) were conducted, as explained in the Indonesian Code of Criminal Procedure (KUHAP) Article 230 paragraph 1, which states: “Court hearings are conducted in the courthouse in the courtroom.” The theoretical framework used to analyze the issues in this research are theory of legislative regulation formation and the legal hierarchy theory introduced by Hans Kelsen, which posits that the legal system is a hierarchical ladder with layered norms. Norms determined by higher legal norms provide the validity basis for the entire legal framework that constitutes a unity.
Using a normative juridical research method, the findings of this research indicate that the establishment of PERMA No. 1 of 2019 is not in conflict with the provisions of Article 230 of the Indonesian Code of Criminal Procedure. This regulation does not violate the principle of the hierarchy of legislation in Indonesia, considering that PERMA is subordinate to laws with higher authority. Therefore, PERMA is consistent with the principle of lex superiori derogat legi inferiori, which stipulates that lower regulations must not contradict higher regulations. The authority of the Supreme Court to enact PERMA is a derivative (delegated) authority. Delegation of legislative authority to the Supreme Court is carried out with the intention of filling legal gaps that cannot always be addressed by legislation. PERMA Number 1 of 2019 serves as a legal gap filler because provisions of general and abstract laws still need to be detailed through lower-level regulations that are concrete and technical.

Keywords: relevance, hierarchy, Supreme Court regulation, Indonesian Code of Criminal Procedure, trial.

Ketersediaan
#
Perpustakaan Universitas Riau 1709123046
1709123046
Tersedia
Informasi Detail
Judul Seri
-
No. Panggil
1709123046
Penerbit
Pekanbaru : Universitas Riau - F. Hukum - Hukum Tata Negara.,
Deskripsi Fisik
-
Bahasa
Indonesia
ISBN/ISSN
-
Klasifikasi
1709123046
Tipe Isi
-
Tipe Media
-
Tipe Pembawa
-
Edisi
-
Subjek
HUKUM TATA NEGARA
Info Detail Spesifik
-
Pernyataan Tanggungjawab
Versi lain/terkait

Tidak tersedia versi lain

Lampiran Berkas
Komentar
Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar