Image of Analisis Yuridis Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 Tentang Petunjuk Bagi Hakim Dalam Mengadili Perkara Permohonan Pencatatan Perkawinan Antar-Umat Yang Berbeda Agama Dan Kepercayaan Terhadap Pasal 35 Huruf A Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 Tentang Administrasi Kependudukan
Penanda Bagikan

CD Skripsi

Analisis Yuridis Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 Tentang Petunjuk Bagi Hakim Dalam Mengadili Perkara Permohonan Pencatatan Perkawinan Antar-Umat Yang Berbeda Agama Dan Kepercayaan Terhadap Pasal 35 Huruf A Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 Tentang Administrasi Kependudukan

The Supreme Court issued Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 2 of 2023 which explains the prohibition on judges throughout Indonesia from granting requests for registration of interfaith marriages. Where this rule is in conflict with Article 35 Letter a of Law Number 23 of 2006. The issuance of SEMA resulted in a setback that hampered the development of the justice system in guaranteeing the rights of citizens from various backgrounds. It can be concluded that SEMA Number 2 of 2023 issued by the chairman of the Supreme Court has violated its constitutionality.
The type of research used by the author is normative legal research or what is known as "legal research". This means that this legal research aims to examine the conformity of existing norms regarding the prohibition on the practice of interfaith marriages in the Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 2 of 2023 with Article 35 Letter a of Law Number 23 of 2006 concerning Population Administration using library study data collection techniques.
SEMA No. 02 of 2023 is a legal instrument made by the Supreme Court which aims to direct judges to reject applications for registering marriages between people of different religions. The urgency of SEMA was created based on pressure from several religious organizations in Indonesia who do not like marriages between people of different beliefs, whereas in Indonesia itself every citizen has the right to marry regardless of the religion adhered to by each partner. Any discrepancies between the Marriage Law and the Population Administration Law must be resolved through changes to the law, not through SEMA. As well as the judge's freedom to decide fairly and in accordance with existing evidence. The issuance of SEMA seems to annul previously existing statutory regulations, in other words the Supreme Court does not review previously applicable statutory regulations in making a decision. In practice, there are still district court judges who grant requests for marriage registration. different religion.

Court Keywords : SEMA, Population Administration Law, Marriage Law.

Ketersediaan
#
Perpustakaan Universitas Riau 1809113364
1809113364
Tersedia
Informasi Detail
Judul Seri
-
No. Panggil
1809113364
Penerbit
Pekanbaru : Universitas Riau - F. Hukum - Hukum Tata Negara.,
Deskripsi Fisik
-
Bahasa
Indonesia
ISBN/ISSN
-
Klasifikasi
1809113364
Tipe Isi
-
Tipe Media
-
Tipe Pembawa
-
Edisi
-
Subjek
HUKUM TATA NEGARA
Info Detail Spesifik
-
Pernyataan Tanggungjawab
Versi lain/terkait

Tidak tersedia versi lain

Lampiran Berkas
Komentar
Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar