CD Skripsi
penerapan model pembelajaran discovery learning (dl) untuk meningkatkan aktivitas dan hasil belajar peserta didik pada materi larutan penyangga di kelas xi 1 sma negeri 6 pekanbaru
Classroom action research using the discovery learning model was applied to
Grade XI 1 students at SMAN 6 Pekanbaru on the subject of buffer solutions. This
research was motivated by the students' difficulty in understanding the material,
where students did not pay attention and were not active in asking questions.
Various problems occurred during the learning process, such as students being
inactive, unfocused, and sleepy when the teacher was teaching the material. These
problems resulted in the students' learning outcomes remaining low.
Learning is considered effective when students are actively involved in the learning
process. However, in reality, students do not participate in the learning process and
are unable to answer questions asked by teachers, resulting in poor learning
outcomes. This is due to students' lack of interest in learning, which necessitates
the use of an efficient learning model. The purpose of this study was to improve the
learning activities and outcomes of students in class XI 1 at SMAN 6 Pekanbaru on
the subject of buffer solutions through the discovery learning model.
The research design used was classroom action research (CAR) conducted through
two cycles, namely cycle I and cycle II. Data collection took place in April-May
2025. This research was conducted in class XI 1 of SMAN 6 Pekanbaru. The results
of the research on the learning activities of students in class XI 1 of SMAN 6
Pekanbaru showed a percentage score of 57.61% in cycle 1, which was classified
as adequate, meaning that it had not yet reached the success criteria, and increased
in cycle II to a score of 71.7%, which was classified as good, meaning that it had
reached the success criteria of more than 61%. Then, in the learning outcomes of
students in class XI 1 of SMAN 6 Pekanbaru, there was an increase in the individual
mastery of students in cycle I with an average of 80.28 and in cycle II with an
average of 88.52. Furthermore, there was an increase in the percentage from
63.88% in cycle I to 94.44% in cycle II, which means that there was an improvement
in student learning outcomes from cycle I to cycle II.
Tidak tersedia versi lain