CD Skripsi

Analisis Yuridis Kekuatan Pembuktian Keterangan Saksi Testimonium De Auditu Pasca Lahirnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor : 65/Puu-Viii/2010

---

The witness testimony set out in Article 1 points 26 and 27 of the Criminal Procedure Code does not provide evidence of witnesses who did not see, hear, or experience a criminal incident or also called Testimonium De Auditu, but with the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 65 / PUU-VIII / 2010 concerning Testing of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law, then the understanding of witness information has been extended. The Constitutional Court as one of the judicial power institutions whose decisions are final and binding, can be one of the sources of criminal procedural law in Indonesia. But in practice there are still many judges who do not follow the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 65 / PUU-VIII / 2010 concerning the expansion of the meaning of the witness as one of the instruments of evidence of legitimate witness testimony at a criminal case in court. Such as Decision Number 93 / Pid.B / 2013 / PN.TK, Decision Number 194 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN.MNK, and Decision Number: 1095 K / PID / 2016. The purpose of writing this undergraduate thesis is, first: To find out the strength of the testimony of the testimonium de auditu's testimony after the birth of the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 65 / PUU-VIII / 2010. Second: To find out the implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 65 / PUU-VIII / 2010 on the testimonies of witnesses of the testimonium de auditu in the decision of the criminal court.
This type of research is normative juridical research, namely research carried out by examining literature with secondary data sources consisting of primary legal material in the form of legislation, secondary legal material legal books, and tertiary legal materials in the form of dictionaries. Then the data are analyzed qualitatively, namely analyzing data descriptively obtained from secondary data.
From the results of the study it can be concluded that, first, the strength of the testimony of the testimonium de auditu's testimony after the birth of the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 65 / PUU-VIII / 2010 is that testimony of testimonium de auditu can be used as a valid evidence in a trial at a criminal case in court because the nature of the Constitutional Court's ruling is final and binding on everyone and makes it a source of criminal procedural law. second, the implication of the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 65 / PUU-VIII / 2010 on the testimony of the witness of the testimonium de audit in the verdict of the criminal court is to make the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 65 / PUU-VIII / 2010 need to be followed and considered in every court decision The Supreme Court and the judicial body below are related to the witness testimony of the auditors in criminal cases.
Keywords: Evidence Tools - Witness Information - Testimonium De Auditu - Decision of the Constitutional Court

---

Ketersediaan

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

-

No. Panggil

09 04. 119 (0104)

Penerbit

Pekanbaru : Universitas Riau – Fakultas Hukum – Hukum Pidana., 2019

Deskripsi Fisik

vi, 71 hlm.; ill.; 29 cm

Bahasa

Indonesia

ISBN/ISSN

-

Klasifikasi

09 04. 119 (0104)

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

-

Subjek

HUKUM PIDANA

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

DAUS

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar